We perceive leaders to be in control of ethics and take authority for both good and bad results when ethics is tackled. For a reasonable timeframe, Philosophers are deliberately discussing ethical leadership and in what leaders should do but the topic is comparably new as an area of social scientific study.
Leaders are role models who lead ethically speaking the significance of ethical standards, constraining their employees accountable to those standards, and with vitality – crafting environments in which others work and live. Ethical leadership has shown to cause a host of positive results and to limit the risk of many negative outcomes. In an ethical system designed to support ethical conduct, leadership may, therefore, be the most important force.
Ethics should be prioritized. An ethical leader means surpassing on being a good person. Make ethics a clear and consistent part of their agendas, set standards, model suitable behavior, and make everyone accountable, should be required by ethical leaders.
Leaders are expected to do the works through some processes like hiring, training, and performance management systems to usher in the right employees and then help employees incorporate the organization’s underlying values.
It is an utmost priority for ethical leadership from the top – because it generates an environment in which lower-level ethical leaders can thrive – but ethical leadership at the supervisory level has a big impact and role on followers’ attitudes and behavior. Don’t forget to motivate, measure, and reward ethical leadership at different levels.
In major ways, ethical leadership matters because of the people under the leadership of the leader rates him/her more ethically, have more favorable job attitudes including job happiness and commitment. As workers are contented with their leader, there are fewer intentions to depart from the organization. This is because workers are complacent to ethical role models who treat them fairly, care about them, and strive for high ethical standards.